The inbox pings again. Another M&A opportunity lands on your desk – an intriguing target, seemingly ready to be acquired. Does it ever feel that like opportunity is knocking constantly and are you truly capitalising on these opportunities, or could this constant stream of deal flow be subtly undermining your carefully constructed M&A strategy?
While a healthy flow of inbound interest can be a positive sign, indicating market dynamism and your firm's profile, the unchecked pursuit of every lead can inadvertently lead to strategic drift, resource depletion, and ultimately, derailment of your core M&A objectives.
The FOMO Factor: Why Organisations Chase Poor Fits
In our experience working with ambitious technology firms and private equity houses, we've observed a striking pattern: organisations frequently spend time diligently evaluating opportunities that clearly don't align with their strategic direction. The primary culprit? Fear of missing out.
Most companies, when receiving an acquisition teaser (with sufficient detail), can quickly determine whether a target fits their criteria. Yet instead of making an immediate decision, they circulate the opportunity widely, inviting colleagues to weigh in. What happens next is particularly telling – team members often get creative, stretching to make the opportunity "fit" where no natural alignment exists.
This pattern creates a dangerous cycle. What should have been an safe and swift "pass" drags into weeks of evaluation. The longer a misaligned opportunity remains under consideration, the harder it becomes to kill the deal. Resources that could be directed toward identifying genuinely valuable opportunities are instead consumed by obligations created through organisational momentum.
We've observed that PE firms typically show laser focus and greater discipline in this regard. Their evaluation processes tend to be swift and decisive – they can often determine whether an opportunity warrants further investigation within minutes, not days or weeks. Technology companies, by contrast, often struggle with longer evaluation cycles, partly because those involved in M&A decisions typically juggle these responsibilities alongside their primary roles.
The Hidden Costs of Inbound Deal Evaluation
The opportunity costs of inefficient deal evaluation extend far beyond wasted time. When organisations fail to quickly shut down poor M&A opportunities, they divert precious attention away from identifying and pursuing deals that would genuinely create value.
M&A requires specialised skills and an M&A mindset, companies serious about making acquisition a key component of their growth strategy need to build these capabilities deliberately, starting with a dedicated pool of people who will review opportunities consistently. This approach ensures familiarity with the evaluation process and promotes honest dialogue, allowing opportunities to be closed down quickly when they fail to meet required standards.
There are situations where misaligned deals actually reach completion. As we've witnessed repeatedly, beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder, and senior executives sometimes champion deals that objectively represent poor strategic choices. When these transactions conclude successfully, two common problems emerge:
First, acquisitions that don't fit the strategy become unloved assets. Staff depart, momentum falters, and value evaporates.
Second, even when the strategic intent was sound, the original vision often gets lost during implementation. The executive who championed the deal moves on to other priorities, and the integration work falls to teams who may not fully understand or share the original strategic rationale. Again, value erodes.
Creating Effective Filters: The Power of Clear Investment Criteria
How can organisations transform inbound deal flow from being potentially disruptive into a strategic asset? In our work with clients across the technology sector, we've found that establishing clear, well-communicated investment criteria is the essential first step.
Effective filters typically include:
Company size thresholds. A £100 million deal requires similar time and resources as a £1 million transaction. Setting minimum and maximum size parameters allows teams to quickly eliminate opportunities outside your strike zone.
Technological fit assessment. Will the acquisition integrate smoothly with existing solutions? While this isn't always a priority, most of our clients consider it critical. If a deal will necessitate extensive code refactoring or create significant technical debt, it often warrants an immediate pass.
Strategic alignment check. Every opportunity should be evaluated against how it helps achieve stated strategic goals. Emergent strategies certainly have their place – sometimes the market presents unexpected opportunities – but the definition of what will be achieved through the acquisition needs to be clearly articulated so value creation can be tracked later.
What makes these criteria so powerful is their role in enabling swift, decisive assessment. Rather than subjecting every inbound opportunity to weeks of evaluation, firms can apply these filters immediately, often determining within minutes whether further investigation is warranted.
Communicating Criteria: The Broker Relationship Advantage
One of the most useful insights we've gained through decades of M&A experience is that brokers can become powerful allies in managing inbound deal flow – but only when you invest time in defining and communicating your acquisition criteria.
We often work with clients to create a simple guide outlining the types of acquisitions they're interested in pursuing. When approached by brokers with new opportunities, they can share these criteria proactively. Far from limiting options, this approach actually improves the quality of inbound opportunities over time.
Brokers appreciate this transparency because it allows them to update their CRM systems and become more selective with future opportunities. They gain valuable insight into what specific companies are seeking, making their own processes more efficient.
Some businesses maintain policies against buying companies in formal sales processes or working with brokers. In our experience, this approach unnecessarily limits access to quality opportunities.
However, brokers typically approach companies only when they have live projects that might be of interest – they rarely source opportunities proactively without a specific mandate.
Companies serious about M&A should welcome broker-sourced opportunities as an important part of their deal mix. The key distinction is whether you're receiving opportunities that have been thoughtfully matched to your interests versus being included on generic distribution lists. The difference comes down to whether you've invested time in defining what you want and communicating those parameters clearly.
Balancing Opportunism and Strategy: When to Pursue New Directions
While we advocate for disciplined adherence to strategic criteria, we've also seen exceptional assets occasionally come to market that offer acquirers compelling reasons to consider new directions. These situations don't invalidate the need for filtering – they simply require a more comprehensive planning approach.
When evaluating opportunities that could take your company in new directions, consider these additional dimensions:
Target operating model implications. How will your business run post-deal? Do you have skills gaps that need addressing? What internal resources will be required, or do you need to expand capabilities?
Value gap analysis. What specific value gap is this deal plugging? How will you measure success? Who will be responsible for delivering that value?
Competitive landscape assessment. How does this acquisition reshape your competitive position? What new competitors might you face?
One common assumption we've seen repeatedly is that existing employees of the acquiring company will take responsibility for acquired businesses. From what we've observed, this rarely works effectively. Pre-acquisition employees are typically busy with their existing responsibilities, may not fully understand the deal rationale, or sometimes feel threatened by the new addition.
Opportunistic acquisitions in adjacent spaces can be immensely successful, but they require an additional layer of planning and dedicated resources to realise their potential. The key is not avoiding these opportunities but ensuring they receive appropriate scrutiny and planning before proceeding.
The PE Approach: Efficiency Through Clarity
Organisations seeking to improve their inbound deal evaluation processes can learn valuable lessons from private equity firms, which typically excel at efficient assessment.
Their approach centres on three core elements:
First, PE firms operate with clearly defined investment theses that specify which sectors they'll invest in.
Second, they establish precise financial profiles for target companies, including growth rates, margins, and other key metrics.
Third, their fund structures typically dictate transaction size parameters, creating natural boundaries around which opportunities warrant consideration.
This clarity enables remarkable efficiency. PE firms can often determine whether an opportunity warrants further investigation within 10 minutes, without involving the wider team. This isn't about being dismissive – it's about preserving valuable resources for opportunities that truly matter.
The approach works because everyone in the organisation shares a collective understanding of what they're looking for. This alignment eliminates the need for extensive discussion around opportunities that clearly fall outside established parameters.
Creating the Infrastructure for Strategic M&A
Organisations structure their M&A teams differently – some maintain large corporate development departments, while others handle transactions through existing leadership teams. In either case, successful firms establish clear guardrails and ensure they're well-communicated throughout the organisation.
What matters most is that companies understand their strategy and the specific value gaps they're seeking to address through acquisition. This collective understanding provides a shared sense of what the organization is looking for, enabling efficient filtering of inbound opportunities.
By investing in this foundational work, businesses can prevent resource cannibalisation between reactive and proactive M&A efforts. With a defined set of criteria, the go/no-go decision process becomes much quicker, freeing time for teams to focus on strategically identified opportunities rather than constantly reacting to inbound proposals.
At Lighthouse Advisory Partners, we bring unique perspective to these challenges. Our team members have all held executive roles within strategy departments and were responsible for running M&A within large technology firms. We've experienced firsthand how being purely reactive to inbound opportunities limits progress toward identifying truly value-creating transactions.
In our previous executive roles, we all implemented similar approaches: investing time with brokers to communicate our acquisition criteria, working with business leaders to clearly define requirements for each division, and developing an M&A mindset throughout the organisation so that promising opportunities could receive rapid internal feedback.
Reclaiming Strategic Control
The early warning sign that your organisation is suffering from strategic drift in M&A is often hidden in plain sight. If your monthly review meetings consistently show no new credible targets entering your pipeline, something isn't working properly. Your team may be so consumed with evaluating inbound opportunities that they lack bandwidth for proactive identification of strategically aligned targets.
Inbound M&A opportunities aren't inherently problematic – they can be valuable sources of growth and sometimes reveal companies you wouldn't have identified through proactive searching. The key distinction is whether these opportunities complement your strategic agenda or distract from it.
By establishing clear investment criteria, communicating those parameters to internal teams and external partners, and implementing efficient filtering processes, you transform inbound interest from a potential derailer into a strategic asset. The goal isn't to reject all inbound opportunities – it's to ensure that every opportunity you pursue, regardless of its source, contributes meaningfully to your strategic objectives.
Don't let the constant knocking of opportunity distract you from the doors you've deliberately chosen to open. With the right approach, you can ensure that inbound M&A interest serves your strategy, rather than subtly undermining it.
留言